G. K. Chesterton ~ “On Jane Austen in the General Election”

I stumbled upon this yesterday and think it rather appropriate as we approach The Election tomorrow – from G. K. Chesterton’s Come to Think of It (Methuen, 1930, originally published in The Illustrated London News, 1 June 1929) – a lovely piece about Wickham and his sort – we shall forgive Mr. Chesterton for misspelling “Bennett” – a curiously common error….

“On Jane Austen in the General Election” – by G. K. Chesterton

THERE was a remark about–Jane Austen in connexion with the General Election. We have most of us seen a good many remarks about Jane Austen in connexion with the Flapper or the New Woman or the Modern View of Marriage, or some of those funny things. And those happy few of us who happen to have read Jane Austen have generally come to the conclusion that those who refer to her have not read her. Feminists are, as their name implies, opposed to anything feminine. But some times they disparaged the earlier forms of the feminine, even when they showed qualities commonly called masculine. They talk of Sense and Sensibility without knowing that the moral is on the side of Sense. They talk about fainting. I do not remember any woman fainting in any novel of Jane Austen. There may be an exception that I have forgotten; there is indeed a lady who falls with a great whack off the Cobb at Lyme Regis. But few ladies would do that as a mere affected pose of sentiment. But rarely does a lady dash herself from Shakespeare’s Cliff or the Monument solely to assume a graceful attitude below. Jane Austen herself was certainly not of the fainting sort. Nor were her favourite heroines, like Emma Woodhouse or Elizabeth Bennett. The real case against Jane Austen (if anybody is so base and thankless as to want to make a case against her) is not that she is sentimental, but that she is rather cynical. Allowing for the different conventions of subject-matter in the two periods, she was rather like Miss Rose Macaulay. But Miss Rose Macaulay finds herself in a world where fainting-fits would be a very mild form of excitement. There is something very amusing about this appeal to a comparison between the novels of the two periods. The heroine of many a modern novel writhes and reels her way through the story, chews and flings away fifty half-smoked cigarettes, is perpetually stifling a scream or else not stifling it, howling for solitude or howling for society, goading every mood to the verge of madness, seeing red mists before her eyes, seeing green flames dance in her brain, dashing to the druggist and then collapsing on the doorstep of the psycho-analyst; and all the time congratulating herself on her rational superiority to the weak sensibility of Jane Austen….

Click here for the rest of the essay at Martin Ward’s Chesterton site: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/books/Jane_Austen_GE.html


Chesterton and wife Frances – wikipedia

You can also read the full text at Google Books from the Collected Works, Vol 35 , essay from The Illustrated London News, June 1, 1929 [this text includes footnotes]

It has also been recently reprinted in: Chesterton, G. K. “Jane Austen in the General Election.” In Defense of Sanity: The Best Essays of G.K. Chesterton. Ed. Dale Ahlquist, Joseph Pearce, and Aidan Mackey. San Francisco: Ignatius, 2011. 196-200.

Chesterton is most known to us as the author of the preface to the first printing of Love and Freindship (Chatto & Windus, 1922) – that essay can be read here as well: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/books/intro-love-and-freindship.html

A reminder to all Vote tomorrow, and hopefully there shall be no Wickhams on any of the winning teams… [I live in Hope…]

c2012 Jane Austen in Vermont

4 thoughts on “G. K. Chesterton ~ “On Jane Austen in the General Election”

  1. Every time I look at David Cameron, Nick Clegg or Ed Miliband, i will see WICKHAM!!!!!!!!
    I know Jane Austen did not have politicians in mind, probably,She was describing a type of behaviour which added to the layers and intrigue of her story, but yes she does get people just right and as GK points out Wickham’s personality and use of half truths and only saying half of the truth is the warp and weft of our politics.

    Your politicians are not like that are they Deb?? Surely not!!!

    Enjoyed Obama’s win over Romney,not because he will be able to do great things ( Congress will stop him) and actually get you a decent NHS and allow, what is it, 40 million people get a decent level of health care but because Romney is such a rapatious business man and you can’t run a country like that. People would suffer greatly and die under a regime lead by a man like that.

    All the best,


  2. Meant to mention, Deb, i am making a very week attempt to keep up with Clive and his rapid and intense journey through all of Dickens novels this year.. He has just completed Little Dorrit and A Tale of Two Cities so look out for some brilliant reviews. I myself are almost fat the end of Little Dorrit. I love Little Dorrit. The point is ,,the Circumlocution office, The Barnacle tribe and the Stiltstakings. Dickens , blatantly went for government departments and politicians. He went blatantly for the jugular of politics.. ha! ha!

    I love Dickens too!!!!!!!!!!! (dare I say,, a man after my heart. Ha! Ha!)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s